Preliminary Call for Papers.
Power/Religion: A Revanche of Reaction or a Metaphor of Revolution?
Venues: University of Helsinki and the European University at St Petersburg
Date: 10-15 September, 2013
After a short-lived belief in the secularization of societies, religion has returned to the political arena with a vengeance. It is one of the most controversial but also determining political issues in today’s world. The majority of contemporary wars and terrorist attacks are religiously laden. The age of theocracies is by no means over. European secular countries are trying to tackle with the issue of religious symbols in the public sphere. Religious words such as blasphemy have reappeared in political vocabulary. While the Lutheran State-Church is reduced to insignificance, in Orthodox countries the Church and the State have entered into a mutual partnership legitimizing each other’s power claims against secular reformists. Overtly secular intellectuals in the West have turned to religious discourses in their quest for tools of cultural and political criticism in order to fight capitalism and neoliberal hegemony. Not Marx or Lenin but the Apostle Paul and Thomas Müntzer are leading revolutionary figures today.
But is religion a reactionary force or does it involve revolutionary potentiality? Or is religion, particularly the Abrahamic religions, fundamentally twofold, originally based on a revolutionary event but developed into a power system of the Church. Or is the very power of the Church based on the fidelity to the revolutionary event in its origin? What about religious doctrines? In the Epistle to the Romans, the Apostle Paul proclaims that every person should be subject to the governing authorities (Romans 13), while in the same letter he observes that we are “not under law but under grace” (Romans 6:14). Further, in Acts 5:29 we may read the Apostles’ collective reply to the high priest who charged them not to preach in the name of Christ: “We must obey God rather than men.” Indeed, does not religion open up a transcendent dimension of freedom within the immanence of political order? Or is it precisely this transcendent dimension of freedom – but also that of secrecy (arcana) – that is needed in order to legitimize clerical and political power? Presumably, there is no definitive answer to these questions, for it is quite obvious that we have to take into account historical contexts: it is probable that same religious principles that empower revolutionary militants can be used by the established Churches in order to suppress them. Or is it? This two-day conference addresses these and related questions. Papers may deal with perennial, historical or contemporary issues. Both theoretical and empirical approaches are welcome.
Organizers:
Mika Ojakangas, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Artemy Magun, European University at St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Sergey Kozin, University of Newcastle, Australia
Roland Boer, University of Newcastle, Australia
Please send paper proposals to me at this stage.
This is the fifth conference to be held under the ‘Religion and Radicalism’ series. To date, we have had:
Copenhagen: September 2010
Taipei: September 2011
Newcastle: October 2012
Herrnhut: March 2013
A five-volume series, under the title of Religion and Radicalism, will gather the articles from this international series of conferences.
4 December, 2012 at 6:20 am
Religion Jesus is not. Religious people wanted to kill Jesus. How then can Jesus be in religions? Blasphemy is grieving the holy spirit away by doing bad to your neighbor. Military does bad to your neighbor Islamic law does bad to your neighbor. legal system does bad top your neighbor. They all grieve the holy spirit away from them. They can repent like Nicodemus repented. Blasphemy cannot be speaking against a religious name like Islam because Islam is not the holy spirit. Islam blasphemies against the e holy spirit by behaving toward people like Jesus would not behave toward people. See your error ,and repent. The holy spirit is heaven in whoever. Jesus is the holy spirit. Jesus gave life not taking life.
I hear that people waring against Syria want to use chemical warfare. That is not doing to people what jesus would do. Repent. Stop grieving the holy spirit away from you.
4 December, 2012 at 6:24 am
To obey men is to not obey the law of loving whoever as yourself. The law of man is condemn,and evil for evil. That is not Gods law.
4 December, 2012 at 10:59 am
Artie, my dear man, is this an abstract? Highly relevant, I must say.
5 December, 2012 at 5:37 am
This is a question I have been contemplating in various ways for the last couple of years. I am not able to attend in person. Are the organizers intersted in non-conference papers to include in a book from the conference? Thanks, Richard
****** ****** ****** ****** I awakened to the cry that the people / have the power to redeem / the work of fools upon the meek / the graces shower it’s decreed / the people rule
(Patti Smith) ****** ****** ****** ****** Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 23:10:58 -0500