How was interest for loans set in the ancient Near East? It is difficult to imagine a situation in which interest ‘rates’ are not intimately connected to the workings of a capitalist ‘market’, but the overwhelming evidence indicates that they were set by royal decree at 20% per annum – pretty much for the entire history of the ANE. This came to be seen as the proper rate, decreed by the gods. It is best described as a customary amount rather than a commercial one. To be sure, there were variations, at times as high as 60% per month (720% per annum), at times lower, but the factors here were extra-economic. A major factor was the desire, by the small number of landlords and the state, to ensure indentured labor (as I pointed out earlier). Another version was the ‘loan’ as an advance payment on an everyday item, such as ivory, a peacock, a monkey, or some common metal like gold – which functioned in a centripetal fashion, to be brought in to enhance the prestige of the potentate in question. In other words, interest rates were socially determined.
6 November, 2012
Interest rates in ancient Mesopotamia
Posted by stalinsmoustache under Sacred Economy | Tags: ancient Near East, interest, loans |[2] Comments
8 November, 2012 at 6:39 pm
Read Jeremy Cataldo’s Breaking Monotheism, yet?
8 November, 2012 at 9:04 pm
Not completely. His thesis concerning monotheism is interesting, but it risks being caught in the specifics of a marginal concern – Yehud. I wonder how it fits with the Persian genius of a centralised diversity, but will read on. And he hasn’t done his homework on private property.