After a few recent visits, I have been struck by a feature of academic life in England and the outlying places that get lumped in together as the ‘UK’. Not the savage neo-liberal cuts to education or the student protests, but an extraordinary topsy-turvy relation between theology and biblical studies. Given the long story of biblical criticism’s effort to extract itself from theology’s ecclesial and confessional control, one would expect biblical criticism to be seeking new engagements outside the small patch of the Bible, eager to make alliances, broaden the perspective etc., while theology would be more concerned with drawing the wagons in a circle and defending its ground. But after two rapid-fire conferences in Durham and Bristol, the obverse seems to be the case (mostly); biblical critics are increasingly confessional in a very conservative manner, peering not so much into their own navals but into those of their reactionary soul-mates, engaging in mutual wanking to a degree not seen for a long time. By contrast, the younger theologians I met are heavily into radical philosophy, Marxism, anarchism, hard-edged environmental politics, reading, engaging, critiquing and asking how theology fits into and responds to such a larger picture. To be sure, there are exceptions, such as the increasingly comic Maclagan, or Edinburgh’s pandering to swathes of evangelical Americans, but the vibe seems to be with the theologians, while more and more biblical critics lose the plot.
24 December, 2010
A world upside-down, or, ‘anarchy in the UK’
Posted by stalinsmoustache under academics, biblical studies, theology, universities | Tags: anarchy in the UK |[12] Comments
25 December, 2010 at 3:40 am
And there you have it; you just described why I am NOT a member of SBL. The same phenom takes place here in the U.S.
25 December, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Fort some weird reaosn I am still a member of both SBL and AAR, wishing I had gone to the latter over the last few years, although I must admit there is a growing core of left-wing people at SBL …
25 December, 2010 at 1:59 pm
I think it’s there with more blatancy and simplicity in the US, and in the UK with bigger word and longer sentences – they’re bred to be like that – they’re a breed. And quite often they refuse to sound their rrrrz. But yes, what you’ve said is right and how you said it is very prettily put indeed. But there is a rumbling new revolution as education is no longer restricted to the upper classes, and younger, brighter, broader, more widely read and experienced worldly thinkers, and intellectually sophisticated to. They are from working class backgrounds and are earning degrees here, bringing with them fresh insights and radical ideas.
25 December, 2010 at 9:04 pm
The more the better!
26 December, 2010 at 10:48 am
yes, they’re presently thin on the ground. And contra that Tamaki snake (apologies to all genuine snakes), enough will never be enough, not until they’re all like this anyway.
26 December, 2010 at 9:30 pm
First, Roland, a very nice interview at KILDEN!! Really great! Second, this post. I thought it was just me – since I am no longer part of the UK theology/rel.stud. work environment. I too found it striking how much of the time at the conference was actually spent disagreeing with certain camps. But then this also goes back to myself, because I don’t have many fora for exploring where the division lines are in UK bibs at the moment, so I found it weirdly interesting. At STK they would not know the people, the issues or understand why I bother (which is probably very healthy). And as outsiders to this environment we may both underestimate the importance that nationally organised/distributed RAF’s, student intakes etc. have on their daily work environment. As long as you are in the UK theol./rel.stud.-subject area, the “conservatives” are your main competitors and discussion partners. If you identify with the subject, the majority of the guild will influence your destiny – although never determine it. This is why I personally could never identify with UK bibs only – its misogyny is shocking, and this makes me doubt whether the field is worth my interest and defense…..
27 December, 2010 at 4:39 am
Thanks for that, Jorunn. What interested me with the two very different gatherings was the focus of discussions and targets of concern: on the theology side, it was very much what is going in the radical side of current philosophy and politics, while on the bs side, the concern was with the creeping dominance of a very conservatively confessional approach (and I do not associate a confessional approach with conservatism be default, as I said a few times).
27 December, 2010 at 5:32 am
And I should add that none of those gathered in Bristol fit into the picture I outlined originally, but they did have a sense of being under pressure. As for me, I am all for turfing the Moberlys and Watsons and Wrights of this world, without a golden handshake or even a pension (well, maybe a little one). They are the real wankers of bs.
30 December, 2010 at 2:47 pm
What?? Mystics cavorting with obscurantists? You don’t say?! Who woulda thought? Things are falling apart! The center cannot hold!!
Merry Perineum, Roland!
31 December, 2010 at 3:13 am
Edinburgh is “The Gulag Evangelago” – if you aren’t one yourself
1 January, 2011 at 8:02 am
[...] Mutual masturbation in biblical studies [...]
1 January, 2011 at 4:20 pm
[...] Boar (Stalin’s Moustache) observes that biblical criticism is being used to hold the high ground, while theologians are venturing out in the…. Dan (On Journeying with those in Exile) interviews Boer about Marxism and [...]