And Deane Galbraith over at the Dunedin School is starting to sound remarkably like another blogger who used to be in the blogosphere …
14 December, 2009
Deane Galbraith on shitting and other matters
Posted by stalinsmoustache under blogs | Tags: Deane Galbraith, Dunedin, shitting |[26] Comments
15 December, 2009 at 12:54 am
Who could you possibly have in mind?
They’re good posts and rather timely for me, because I’m reading an informative book on the ethics of obscene speech in early Christianity. See Watch Your Mouth.
15 December, 2009 at 1:41 am
In other news, the regenerated NT Wrong sounds nothing like him.
16 December, 2009 at 9:24 pm
Why would I want to?
15 December, 2009 at 2:11 am
Yes, it’s uncanny.
16 December, 2009 at 9:26 pm
It would be even uncannier if I started to sound like you!
15 December, 2009 at 4:40 am
oh shoosh – but then again I’m surprised with all that ‘gigantic’ intellectual sophistication the masses haven’t twigged.
16 December, 2009 at 9:34 pm
If it comforts you: I had to look up ‘to twig’ in a dictionary.
+Wrong
17 December, 2009 at 3:23 am
oh go away impersonator!
17 December, 2009 at 6:49 am
Impersonate? Me, impersonate? Nice try but no. I wouldn’t want to impersonate that “hero of biblioblogdom” if I had it in me. For the time being, all you can do is look forward to the next regeneration, though I wouldn’t be too sure that it won’t be a further degeneration.
+Wrong
17 December, 2009 at 7:02 am
why pick on the name? You sound more like NT Wright.
17 December, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Yes, why pick on the name? Perhaps in order to show how wrong Wright sounds? But are you sure that I’m able to tell Wright from Wrong?
On second thoughts: I couldn’t possibly fail to disagree with you less.
Now, *that’s* definitely wrong.
18 December, 2009 at 3:17 am
of course you can’t tell the difference. That’s obvious. :-p
15 December, 2009 at 7:54 am
No one in particular, although it’s a bit like returning to the scene of the crime.
15 December, 2009 at 8:35 am
bollocks
16 December, 2009 at 10:13 pm
Interesting that some stranger called ‘Wrong’ should make an appearance here. Go figure.
17 December, 2009 at 3:25 am
it’s probably Jimmy McGrath. He was the first to ‘announce’ him and he was the only ‘follower’ on the side bar. Since he got accused, he’s disappeared from the side bar. Go figure.
17 December, 2009 at 6:54 am
Another nice try, Steph. I’m sure Dr McGrath sets his alarm clock to 3am in the morning (or whatever similar hour it was at his place when I posted a couple of my last posts). His wife and son would really appreciate that. I’ll grant that he isn’t completely innocent but he definitely isn’t as wrong as me.
+Wrong
17 December, 2009 at 7:01 am
like you’re antipodean eh.
17 December, 2009 at 6:55 pm
That’s the tricky bit about playing a regeneration of Wrong. Whatever I claim, who will take my word for it? So, for whatever it’s worth: 1. I *am* writing this from the Southern hemisphere; 2. I haven’t been on the same continent as Dr McGrath for several years now (however much I’d like to see him again face to face); 3. I’m sad to say that I’m no longer in Dunedin. And I’m only giving all of this away because I really appreciate you, Steph.
Cheers!
+Wrong
18 December, 2009 at 3:15 am
because I the only one who is paying any attention to you (other than James) :-p
16 December, 2009 at 10:40 pm
What could be more or less Wrong? However, I only made an appearance here after mentioning your mention of shit in Dunedin here.
+Wrong
17 December, 2009 at 7:00 am
was it really worth mentioning?
17 December, 2009 at 6:57 pm
No, of course not. 90% of blogging probably isn’t. But just look what an intriguing discussion about my identity it has generated. Haven’t you noticed that Wrongs are often egocentric? (One of the few characteristics they share with Wrights.)
18 December, 2009 at 3:13 am
no actually I haven’t – the real Wrong isn’t particularly ‘egocentric’, although I guess you must be if you think the apparent ‘discussion’ (I wasn’t aware of any other than this ridiculous conversation and James McGrath’s comments) is interesting – it has neither the wit nor the intellectual sophistication of Wrong.
18 December, 2009 at 9:52 pm
someone obviously made the “wrong” choice in picking (on?) me – ah well, good luck with the next one
19 December, 2009 at 1:20 am
wrong choice? no. I happened to be on the same comment thread, that’s all.